Home
    • Home
    • About us
    • Our members
    • Topics
    • Press
    • Projects
    • Get involved
    • Resources
    • Contact

Topics

  • ECRE's Agenda for Europe
  • Access to Europe
  • Asylum in the EU
  • Resettlement
  • Integration
  • Return
  • Protection Beyond Europe
Home >> Topics >> Return

Return

Return usually suggests the process of being sent back to the country of origin or habitual residence. ECRE encourages all stakeholders to use the following definitions of return:

  • Voluntary return/repatriation: the return of persons with a legal basis for remaining in the host state who have made an informed choice and have freely consented to repatriate.

  • Mandatory return: refers to persons who no longer have a legal basis for remaining in the territory of the host state and who are therefore required by law to leave the country. It also applies to individuals who have consented to leave, or have been induced to leave by means of incentives or threats of sanctions.

  • Forced return: the return of those who have not given their consent and therefore may be subject to sanctions or the use of force in order to effect their removal.

ECRE does not dispute the fact that governments have the right to return asylum seekers whose applications have been correctly rejected. Nevertheless, ECRE believes that people should only be returned following a fair and efficient examination of their asylum claims.

Where return is not possible for technical or other reasons, or where it would be inhumane, people should be granted a legal status to remain in the country of residence. States should prioritise voluntary repatriation and ensure that all returns are carried out in a safe, dignified and sustainable manner.

EU Rules

The Directive on common standards and procedures for the return of irregularly staying third country nationals was endorsed by the European Parliament in June 2008 and officially adopted by the Council on 9 December 2008. Once in force, EU Member States will have to incorporate it into national law within two years. The Directive foresees the imposition of entry bans which will prohibit deported asylum seekers from coming to the EU for up to 5 years, without taking into account possible changes in the circumstances of their countries of origin which may force them to leave again. Furthermore, under the Directive Member States will be allowed to detain people who have committed no crime, including unaccompanied children and families, for a period of up to 18 months.

The EU is also pursuing Readmission Agreements with several third countries as a way to facilitate the return of people who have entered states' territories irregularly or who have overstayed. Relying on existing readmission agreements, national authorities often return people immediately after they have crossed the border irregularly without previously ascertaining their protection needs.


ECRE's position
  • While ECRE supported the establishment of harmonised standards safeguarding the rights of individuals subject to returns procedures, we believe that the Returns Directive falls well short of this objective.

  • States should prioritise voluntary repatriation and ensure that all returns are carried out in a safe, dignified and sustainable manner.

  • Detention should only be used as a last resort, as long as removal arrangements are in progress and when other alternatives have been proven ineffective.

  • ECRE is opposed to the notion of a 5-year entry ban being imposed on asylum seekers whose applications have been rejected and who are facing return. Removal should be considered a sufficient resolution to their situation.

  • EU countries should ensure that the persons crossing the border irregularly are given the possibility to express their protection needs, in order for them not to be returned - directly or indirectly - to countries where they would be at risk of persecution (Visit our section on Access to Europe).

  • Where return is not possible or where it would be inhumane, people should be granted a legal status to remain in the country of residence.

ECRE Policy Papers
  • Way Forward: The Return of Asylum Seekers whose Applications have been Rejected

  • ECRE Information Note on the Returns Directive

  • ECRE position on Return

  • Comments on common standards and procedures in Member States for returning illegally staying third country nationals

  • Guidelines on the Treatment of Iraqi Asylum Seekers and Refugees in Europe

  • Guidelines on the Treatment of Chechen Internally Displaced Persons (IDPs), Asylum Seekers & Refugees in Europe

  • Guidelines on the Treatment of Afghan Asylum Seekers and Refugees in Europe

  • Comments on the Commission Proposal for Establishing the European Refugee Fund (ERF) for 2005 - 2010

ECRE Actions
  • ECRE/Amnesty International Joint Letter on Returns directive to the Members of the European Parliament

ECRE Press Releases
  • Returns Directive: European Parliament and Member States risk compromising respect for migrants' rights

  • Returns Directive: EU fails to uphold human rights

ECRE Projects
  • Monitoring safe and dignified return and conditions of detention in Belarus, Moldova, the Russian Federation and Ukraine

  • Current Challenges for Return in the Western Balkans: An NGO perspective

  • Increasing refugee participation in the field of voluntary return

Other Sources
  • Christian NGOs: Comments on the Proposal for a Directive on Common Standards and Procedures in Member States for Returning Illegally Staying Third Country Nationals

  • UNHCR: Return of Persons not in Need of International Protection

  • UNHCR: Position on the Proposal for a Directive on Common Standards and Procedures in Member States for Returning Illegally Staying Third-Country Nationals

  • European Parliament: Refugee Status in EU Member States and Return Policies

  • European Migration Network: Return Migration

  • EU: European Return Fund

  • Council of Europe: 20 Guidelines on Forced Return

Contact - Disclaimer - Copyright - Site Map